Navigation

Fox 308 - 323

 

Polar Fox:
Hey Red, these points seem to have identity issues. Are they black or white?

Red Fox: An obvious illusion! They are white for sure.

Polar Fox: So what I perceive is not the exact reality?

Red Fox: This is just a simple game of colors playing on your retina. It is perfectly explainable and part of the reality.

Polar Fox: Yes, most definitely. But, can this be an artful clue of an even bigger reality that there is truth beyond what you see?

Red Fox: Here we go again!

Polar Fox: A brush mark from a picture? A letter from a book? A note from a symphony?

Red Fox: And who is the artist, juggling with colors to deceive our perception?

Polar Fox: Deceive? I am not so sure. But looks like someone who knows us inside and out. And I think he wants to talk.

Red Fox: Why me? Why me?

Polar Fox: Yep, and you have bigger ears than mine.

 

 
Dervish Fox: I see some beauty between this one and Fox 316.
 
Red Fox
: Would you please help me see that beauty?

Dervish Fox: The term "sin(B)+sin(C)-sin(A)" has evolved into "sin(B+C-A)
" in this one. And the rest is identical.

Red Fox: And you found that beautiful?

Dervish Fox: Both answers are very different and very similar at the same time. Don't you feel anything about that?

Red Fox: I am a rational guy. I depend on my intelligence only. I can easily prove both and there is nothing magical or irrational about that. Everything's explainable. Pure and simple!

Dervish Fox: And is that all you can be? Is that the only direction you can grow? Is that who you are, or are you more than that? Why walk when you can fly? Why mutter when you can sing? Why scribble when you can paint?

Red Fox: I think I am starting to feel little bit of annoyance.

Dervish Fox: Not bad for a start my friend, not bad at all !

Bleaug has a solution for this general case.

Labels: , , , , ,


 
Labels: , , ,

Based on our earlier analysis, the sample picture above will never happen.


Labels:
, , , ,

Polar Fox: I have a problem with this one!
Red Fox: What's wrong with it?
Polar Fox: Nothing moves continuously?
Red Fox: Come again?!
Polar Fox: The universe is discrete! THERE IS NO CONTINUUM.
Red Fox: Then how do the things move, flow, or slide?
Polar Fox: Nothing moves! Absolutely nothing moves!!
Red Fox: But the time ticks away, no? Clock arms DO advance.
Polar Fox: No, they don't! But they die in one instance and resurrect in the next one. In between no measurable time passes. Matter oscillates between existence and non-existence continuously.
Red Fox: Continuously? Isn't that ironic?
Polar Fox: Between any two existence, there is nothing but emptiness.
Red Fox: I am having the feeling that your intelligence fall into non-existing state just now.
Polar Fox: Hold on. I think I am about to jump back into the reality. Wait a sec.
Red Fox: Take your time dude. Just take your time!




Labels: , , ,


 
Labels: , , ,

Bleaug adds new meaning to "laziness".
Hmmm, do your lazy tricks lazy scientists to solve this one, huh?
The similarity of the terms with Fox 3 is striking.

 
 
 


Bleaug submitted the above fox, saying:
"a problem which can be expressed in geometric terms and
that is elegantly solved using pure algebraic arguments, still giving deep insight."
General case of this problem can be found in literature.


Here is an old one, re-formatted:

Labels: , ,

Need help?  See Fox 3.

 

 
Labels: , , ,

See a similar one (Fox 238). They may be related!



Labels: , , ,

More can be found at  You can add comments, discuss solutions.
Send us a note --->   <---

+ Curiosity kills the cat!
- Hey, I am no cat.  I am canine. 
+ So you're a dog?
- Well, actually vulpes vulpes to be more accurate.
+ Why double for a name?
- The name so nice, you say it twice.